Baekgom's Variety Story Baekgom's Variety Story
posts / Current Affairs

Global Stablecoin Regulation: Changing the Future of Money

phoue

• 12 min read • --

After the collapse of FTX and Terra, governments around the world began to reshape the digital asset market.

  • Key contents and goals of stablecoin regulations in the U.S., Europe, and South Korea
  • Winners and losers in the new regulatory environment
  • Impact on the global financial landscape and the future of decentralized finance (DeFi)

Prologue: The Day the Music Stopped

In November 2022, the cryptocurrency empire FTX collapsed overnight. This event was not just a corporate bankruptcy; it marked the moment the illusion of an unregulated market shattered and signaled a massive shift in U.S. financial policy. It was an extension of the $40 billion evaporation incident involving the algorithmic stablecoins Terra and Luna that occurred months earlier.

The Terra-Luna incident and the FTX collapse became a decisive catalyst for global regulatory discussions.
The Terra-Luna incident and the FTX collapse became a decisive catalyst for global regulatory discussions.

These two events proved the harsh reality that the name ‘stable’ does not guarantee stability, awakening regulatory authorities worldwide.

Amidst the ashes of chaos, policymakers in Washington, Brussels, and Seoul finally took up their swords. This article dissects how the new laws introduced by various countries are not merely about market cleanup but are strategic choices concerning their financial hegemony and technological leadership. We will follow how these new rules are fundamentally changing the global financial landscape and the future of money.

Chapter 1: The U.S. Blueprint: Stablecoin Regulation and Dollar Hegemony

The U.S. has codified a national blueprint for digital assets, using the FTX and Terra incidents as justification. The core of this strategy is a dual approach: ‘Promote’ private-issued stablecoins and ‘Prohibit’ central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

1.1. From Chaos to Clarity: The Prelude to Regulation

While everyone agreed on the need for regulation, there was intense conflict in Washington over ‘how’ to do it. The Payment Stablecoin Clarity Act (H.R. 4766) advocating for ‘inclusion in the system’ clashed with the CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633) promoting ‘regulatory relief for innovation’.

Ultimately, the dramatic collapse of FTX dismantled the position of ‘regulatory relief’, and the discussion quickly tilted towards a model that ensures legality through strong safeguards.

1.2. The ‘GENIUS’ Act: The Birth of the Official Digital Dollar

After much debate, on July 18, 2025, the U.S. Stablecoin Innovation Guidelines and Establishment Act (GENIUS Act) was enacted. This law defines the new rules for the U.S. digital dollar.

Key Mechanisms:

  • Authorized Issuers: The act adopts a ‘dual banking system model’ where both subsidiaries of traditional banks and non-bank fintech companies (e.g., Circle) that pass federal scrutiny can be issuers.
  • 100% Reserve Requirement: All digital dollars must be backed by cash, short-term U.S. Treasury securities, and other ‘high-quality liquid assets’ at a 1:1 ratio.
  • Transparency and Consumer Protection: Issuers must disclose reserve details audited by independent accounting firms monthly.
  • Interest Payment Prohibition: To prevent stablecoins from directly competing with bank deposits, interest payments are explicitly prohibited. This is a crucial provision defining stablecoins as ‘payment instruments, not investments’.
  • Clarification of Jurisdiction: Authorized stablecoins are defined as a new asset that is neither securities nor commodities, putting an end to jurisdictional disputes between the SEC and CFTC.

The true genius of this legislation lies in mandating that reserves for the ‘U.S. digital dollar’ used globally must be held exclusively in U.S. Treasury securities, automatically creating demand for U.S. Treasuries as the demand for digital dollars increases, thereby enhancing the dollar’s dominance.

1.3. The Forbidden Fruit: Why the U.S. Rejected ‘FedCoin’

Through the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act, the U.S. legally blocked the emergence of a central bank-issued digital currency (CBDC), commonly referred to as ‘FedCoin’. The primary reason is the fear of a ‘financial surveillance society’ where the government could monitor all citizens’ financial transactions in real-time.

This act prohibits the Federal Reserve from directly issuing CBDCs to individuals or using them as monetary policy tools, and it bars any related research without explicit congressional approval.

Here, the U.S.’s sophisticated ‘Prohibit & Promote’ strategy is revealed. By legally eliminating the public option of CBDCs, it creates an ‘intentional void’ that regulated private digital dollars can fill, rolling out the red carpet for them.

1.4. The Incomplete Masterplan: RFIA and FIT21

The Senate’s Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act (RFIA) and the House’s Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21) serve as the ‘masterplan’ for an integrated legal framework encompassing the entire digital asset ecosystem.

The core of these bills is to provide answers to the question of whether cryptocurrencies are securities or commodities based on a new standard of ‘decentralization’. Only those that are not sufficiently decentralized will be exceptionally treated as ‘securities’, while the rest will be considered ‘commodities’, granting primary supervisory authority to the CFTC. These bills are significant not for their passage but for serving as the ‘intellectual source code’ for subsequent legislation, guiding the direction of U.S. regulation.

Chapter 2: Global Reactions: A World of Walled Gardens

In response to the U.S. moves, other major economies are also establishing their own unique legal frameworks reflecting their philosophies, leading to a market fragmented into ‘walled gardens’ of regulations.

2.1. Europe’s Fortress: MiCA and the Defense of Euro Sovereignty

The European Union (EU) has implemented the world’s first comprehensive cryptocurrency legislation, the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). MiCA prioritizes strong consumer protection and the defense of the euro’s monetary sovereignty.

Key Mechanisms:

  • Strict Issuer Requirements: Stablecoin issuers are effectively limited to credit institutions (banks) or electronic money institutions authorized within the EU.
  • Consumer Protection Focus: Issuers must segregate reserves with external custodians and are subject to soundness regulations akin to banks.
  • ‘Sovereignty Clause’: If the use of stablecoins pegged to currencies other than the euro (e.g., USDC) becomes excessive, regulatory authorities can halt new issuances. This is a clear defensive strategy against the spread of dollar stablecoins.

2.2. Cautious Phoenix: Rebuilding After Korea’s Trauma

South Korea, the ‘ground zero’ of the Terra-Luna incident, is pursuing a two-phase legislative strategy.

Phased Approach:

  1. Phase 1 (User Protection): The Virtual Asset User Protection Act, effective July 2024, focuses on protecting user assets and prohibiting unfair trading practices.
  2. Phase 2 (Establishment of Basic Law): The Digital Asset Basic Act, targeted for implementation in the second half of 2025, will regulate the entire industry, including stablecoin regulations.

Key Issues:

  • Issuer Qualification: Intense discussions are ongoing about whether to allow only banks or also fintech companies meeting certain criteria.
  • Won-Centric Focus: The emphasis is on preventing foreign currency outflows and nurturing a won-based stablecoin market.

Comparative Analysis of Global Stablecoin Regulations

Regulatory Feature U.S. (GENIUS Act) European Union (MiCA) South Korea (Two-Phase Legislation)
Main Goals Promote regulated USD stablecoins, strengthen USD hegemony Comprehensive market regulation, protect euro sovereignty User protection, foster domestic innovation
Issuer Qualification Dual system: banks, authorized non-banks Primarily limited to authorized credit institutions (banks) Under discussion: banks and authorized fintech likely
Reserve Regulations 1:1 collateralized by HQLA (cash, Treasuries, etc.) Segregated liquid reserves, capital adequacy requirements Expected to mandate 1:1 collateralization with safe assets
Algorithmic Coins Effectively banned Effectively banned Strong regulation or ban expected
Foreign Coins Limited allowance in ‘similar’ regulatory countries EU authorization required, restrictions if euro sovereignty threatened Encouragement of domestic won-based coin usage

Chapter 3: Market Restructuring: New Rules and Winners-Losers

The introduction of regulations is a ‘game changer’ fundamentally altering the dynamics of the stablecoin market.

3.1. Major Shift: Winners and Losers in the Regulatory Era

The essence of competition is now not technology or liquidity, but ‘regulatory compliance’ and ‘jurisdiction’.

  • Winners (Onshore Compliant Issuers): U.S.-based Circle (USDC) is the biggest beneficiary. Their business model perfectly aligns with the standards required by the GENIUS Act, positioning them as the ‘regulated gateway’ most preferred by institutional investors.
  • Challengers (Offshore and Opaque Issuers): Long-time market dominator Tether (USDT) faces the greatest challenges. Issues like offshore registration and reserve opacity directly conflict with the new regulatory requirements. The moves of major European exchanges to delist USDT ahead of MiCA’s implementation prove this.

3.2. Fragmentation of Liquidity

Once a singular global liquidity pool, liquidity is now fragmenting according to legal boundaries of each country, a phenomenon known as ‘Liquidity Fragmentation’.

  • European Zone: Due to MiCA regulations, non-compliant coins like USDT are being expelled, concentrating liquidity in USDC or euro-based coins.
  • U.S. Zone: The GENIUS Act will form a massive liquidity block centered around regulated dollar stablecoins like USDC.
  • Asian Zone: Countries like South Korea will foster a won-based stablecoin market, creating regional liquidity silos.

This fragmentation imposes significant operational burdens on global exchanges and traders, increasing compliance costs and reducing capital efficiency.

3.3. Institutional Green Light: Influx of Traditional Financial Capital

The clarity of regulations opens the door for institutional investors to enter the digital asset market.

  • Payments and Financial Management: Companies will have powerful tools to process cross-border payments 24/7 and manage finances on-chain.
  • On-chain Settlement: Plays an essential role as a settlement asset in the tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) market.
  • Integration of Banks and Fintechs: Major financial institutions like JPMorgan and PayPal will have clear pathways to issue their own stablecoins or integrate existing services.

Chapter 4: A New World Order: The Future of Geopolitics and Finance

Regulated stablecoins are creating new dynamics surrounding currency competition and the future of money.

4.1. The Tale of Two Systems: The U.S. vs. China Model

Two distinct models are fiercely competing for the future of digital currency. In my view, the clash between these two models resembles a proxy battle of ideologies beyond mere technological competition. Which future do you prefer?

The U.S. private-led model and China’s state-controlled model are competing for the future of digital currency.

  • U.S. Model (Private-led, Public Regulation): Private enterprises lead innovation on public blockchains while the government sets the rules. The goal is to export the digital dollar as a regulated ‘financial product’ to expand the dollar system globally.
  • China Model (State Control): Operates the digital yuan (e-CNY) on a private ledger directly controlled by the central bank. The goal is to export a ‘financial infrastructure’ controlled by the state to bypass the dollar-centric system and enhance state surveillance capabilities.

Comparison of Strategies of the Two Digital Currency Superpowers

Strategic Vector U.S. (Private-led Model) People’s Republic of China (State Control Model)
Core Technology Regulated stablecoins (based on public blockchain) Digital yuan (e-CNY) (private ledger)
Governance Issued by private enterprises (indirect government oversight) Direct issuance by the central bank (direct state control)
Privacy Limited anonymity (no direct government surveillance) All transactions can be monitored in real-time
Main Goals Strengthen dollar dominance, promote private innovation Reduce dependence on the dollar, enhance state surveillance capabilities
Global Strategy Export ‘financial products’ Export ‘financial infrastructure’

4.2. DeFi at a Crossroads: The Existential Challenge of Regulation

Stablecoin regulation presupposes clear legal accountability, which conflicts with the core philosophy of decentralized finance (DeFi) that lacks a central operating entity. This could lead to the DeFi ecosystem splitting into two paths.

  • Permissioned/Institutional DeFi: New DeFi platforms will emerge that adopt identity verification (KYC) and only use regulated stablecoins like USDC to attract institutional funds.
  • Permissionless DeFi: Existing DeFi may be pushed into areas beyond regulatory reach, remaining a niche market isolated from mainstream financial systems.

4.3. Blurred Boundaries: The Great Convergence of Cryptocurrency and Traditional Finance

Ultimately, regulation will break down barriers between cryptocurrency and traditional finance, accelerating the convergence of the two worlds. Regulatory authorities can exert strong influence over the entire ecosystem by controlling stablecoins, which serve as the gateway between fiat and cryptocurrency worlds.

This means that stablecoin legislation effectively sets the standards for the entire industry, acting as a ‘Trojan Horse’. While the market becomes safer and larger, it will lose some of its initial dynamism and disruptive potential.

Conclusion: New Game, New Rules

Global stablecoin regulation marks the beginning of a massive experiment reshaping the future of money.

Key Summary:

  1. U.S. Dual Strategy: The U.S. prohibits state-controlled CBDCs while promoting regulated private stablecoins, pursuing both free market values and financial hegemony.
  2. Era of Regulated Decentralization: The winners in the market will be those companies that combine the trust of traditional finance with the innovation of digital technology, with compliant firms like Circle (USDC) gaining an advantageous position.
  3. Geopolitical Crossroads: The world will be divided into blocks of the U.S.-led private model and the China-led state model, with other countries facing significant strategic choices.

It will be fascinating to see how this new financial architecture operates. Both investors and developers must closely monitor the changing regulatory environment and establish strategies that align with the new rules.

References
#global-stablecoin-regulation#digital-assets#stablecoins#ftx-incident#mica#genius-act

Recommended for You

No Longer Just an Appliance Company: Why LG Became the Architect of the Robot Market

No Longer Just an Appliance Company: Why LG Became the Architect of the Robot Market

20 min read
Earth's Lungs Stronger Than Forests: Korea's Tidal Flats Are Changing the Game Against Climate Crisis

Earth's Lungs Stronger Than Forests: Korea's Tidal Flats Are Changing the Game Against Climate Crisis

9 min read
Food crisis, data and truth: Have you heard of the 'Empty Plate Paradox'?

Food crisis, data and truth: Have you heard of the 'Empty Plate Paradox'?

12 min read

Advertisement

Comments